Unveiling the Hidden Complexities of Rights and Identity with Sui Generis
Welcome to this in-depth discussion with expert Sui Generis, known for his profound insights into rights, identity, and the obfuscation often present in legal systems. Join us as we peel back the layers of assumptions, language manipulation, and the intricate web of legal definitions that impact our daily lives. This episode is packed with thought-provoking questions and pivotal information that can shift your understanding of rights and legal interactions.
Timestamps:
00:00 – Introduction and Overview
01:12 – Significance of Conduct and Evidence
02:00 – Introduction to Thomas Paine’s Views on Rights
04:25 – The Distinction Between Reality and Perception
09:03 – Role of Courts and the Search for Truth
12:24 – Government and the Origin of Rights
15:29 – Terms of Art and Their Implications
18:35 – Understanding the Wigmore Quote on Plain Meaning
21:04 – Importance of Intention in Legal Terms
23:12 – Conduct and Contracts: Implications and Examples
27:15 – Assumption of Authority and Identity
30:36 – The Role of Population Registers and Birth Certificates
37:30 – Investigating Identity and Breeder Documents
44:49 – Displacing of a Newborn Child: A Powerful Term
48:04 – Presumptions, Evidence, and Legal Standing
54:14 – The Power of Asking the Right Questions
01:01:45 – Sovereignty, Regency, and Governing Capacity
01:08:34 – Importance of Digging Deep into Legal Definitions
01:14:12 – The Role and Perception of Courts
01:23:38 – Final Thoughts and Recommendations
Key Points Covered:
Introduction and Overview: Adrian introduces the discussion with Sui Generis, focusing on understanding rights, identity, and the manipulation of legal language and assumptions.
Importance of Conduct and Evidence: Sui Generis emphasizes how conduct and evidence play a crucial role in legal interactions and how they can be leveraged to assert rights.
Thomas Paine’s Perspectives on Rights: Exploration of Thomas Paine’s views on government, rights, and how rights are derivatively granted, not inherent, to governmental bodies.
Reality vs. Perception: Discussion on the distinction between actual events and the narratives constructed through language, documents, and assumptions.
Role of Courts: The courts’ function as tribunals of truth, examining how evidence is presented and assessed to determine what actually happened.
Origin of Rights: Sui Generis explains the complex origin of rights and how people’s misinterpretations of these origins lead to false assumptions about authority.
Terms of Art: The concept of terms of art, where words used in specific contexts have unique meanings, and how misunderstanding these can lead to legal misinterpretations.
Wigmore’s Plain Meaning Quote: Insight into Wigmore’s quote on the plain meaning of words and how the true meaning is determined by the writer’s intention.
Intention in Legal Terms: The significant role of intention in law and how it influences the interpretation and implication of actions and words.
Contracts and Conduct: Examples of how conduct can imply acceptance of a contract and the legal implications of such actions.
Assumption of Authority: The process by which assumed authority is enforced and the questioning of such assumptions.
Population Registers and Birth Certificates: Examination of how these documents are created, their implications on identity, and their role in legal assumptions of status and rights.
Investigating Identity: The importance of understanding breeder documents and tracing the origin of identity assumptions.
Displacing of a Newborn Child: Analysis of this term from the EU term bank and its shocking implications on identity and legal assumptions.
Presumptions and Evidence: How legal standing can be affected by presumed evidence and the necessity of questioning and rebutting these assumptions.
Asking the Right Questions: The power of carefully crafted questions in revealing truth and legal standing, and the potential impact on legal processes.
Sovereignty and Regency: Discussion on the concepts of sovereignty, regency, and their implications on governing authority and personal rights.
Role and Perception of Courts: Changing the perception of courts as places of truth-seeking rather than intimidation and understanding their role in upholding justice.
Final Thoughts: Adrian and Sui Generis reflect on the discussion, emphasizing the importance of understanding legal structures, questioning assumptions, and asserting rights.
For your reference some useful websites:
Dictionary: Miriam Webster: https://www.merriam-webster.com/
Online etymology dictionary: https://www.etymonline.com/
IATE – EU terminology database: https://iate.europa.eu/home
This term has since been deleted from the EU term bank:
‘displacing of a new-born child’ “ to allot to a woman a child which she did not bear whether the fraud was committed by herself or by a third party or whether the displaced child and or the mother concerned are only fictitious persons”
The Wigmore Quote:
“The ordinary standard, or ‘plain meaning,’ is simply the meaning of the people who did not write the document. The fallacy consists in assuming that there is or ever can be some one real or absolute meaning. In truth there can be only some person’s meaning; and that person, whose meaning the law is seeking, is the writer of the document.” – Wigmore, Evidence § 2462 (Chadbourn rev. 1981).
We will be covering the following in more detail in a future episode.
The Birth certificate fraud
The information recorded at the hospital or at the home birth if a midwife or doctor is present is used to create the systems (their) Birth Certificate and then their registered “person” being their legal fiction, their character. He who creates owns. The documents are their creation and the Birth Certificate, in the UK, is Crown Copyright, so although they “say” it is “yours”, it is not. Nor are you the database entry, the pieces of paper and electronic data, the fictitious registered “person” they created. You are you, all of you. What they have recorded was created using just a part of you that was cut from you in an act of violence. Your umbilical cord, the placenta and other afterbirth materials are claimed as born alive as a separate entity and are taken from you as abandoned property. [ Venner v State of Maryland “when a person does nothing and says nothing to indicate an intent to assert his right of ownership, possession, or control over such material, the only rational inference is that he intends to abandon the material” https://law.justia.com/cases/maryland/court-of-special-appeals/1976/166-september-term-1975-0.html]. This is the biological material they use to create the fictional registered “person”. It cannot represent the whole you, nor does it acknowledge that you were created at the moment of fertilisation some 9 months or so before your arrival from within mum. So, if you identify yourself as their fictitious created character, their registered person, then they are assuming and presuming that is a choice you have made. Be it by coercion or obfuscation, or out of ignorance, it is still a choice you are making and by identifying as the registered “person”, that act changes your status as you are acting in the capacity of the “person”, and not the in the capacity of man or woman with God given unalienable rights. Identifying as, and acting as the person has consequences.
Anything done ‘in the name of’ the registered person is registered as something the registered person did, although it cannot do anything on its own, being a fictitious character. It’s the same with medical records. They are all records of the registered person. The man or woman acting in that capacity is the ‘moving spirit’ of it, the one that ‘brings it to life’, for the purpose that the act can be recorded as having been done by that registered person. That’s how his-story is written.
These three Crrow777 Radio episodes with Sui Generis (and you might want to look up the meaning of Sui Generis) will also expose a great deal of important information. You will hear about the paper trail that is used to create the fraud.
This episode is Kurt Kallanbach and Sui Generis:
https://www.buzzsprout.com/1867003/11890049-episode-51-john-9-25-kjv
These podcasts with Kurt Kallanbach are worth listening to and letting the information soak into your mind.
https://www.buzzsprout.com/1867003
Episode #58 The “Expert Witness” – https://www.buzzsprout.com/1867003/12407132-episode-58-the-expert-witness
EU Terminology website can be used to see the language used in “laws” in EU territories. The linked example is for “live birth”.
https://iate.europa.eu/entry/result/1568722/all
Search the Vatican archives
https://www.vatican.va/content/vatican/en.html
International Law
https://www.youtube.com/@InternationalLawMOOC/videos
